Washington Commanders vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats
Washington Commanders vs Green Bay Packers match player stats are of the most searched numbers after any meeting between these two teams, and for good reason. Their latest game was a tale of two quarterbacks, who protected the ball and made big throws, and who spent the night running from pressure.
One quick note before the numbers. As of mid-October 2026, the two teams do not face each other on Washington’s regular-season schedule, so the most recent head-to-head is the Thursday night game from September 11, 2025. Every stat below comes from that game. We’ll update this page when the teams meet again.
The Final Score at a Glance
The Packers beat the Commanders 27-18, leading 7-0 after quarter, 14-3 at the half, and 17-3 entering the fourth. Washington scored all 15 of its fourth-quarter points in a late comeback attempt that came up short.
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington Commanders | 0 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 18 |
| Green Bay Packers | 7 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 27 |
Quarterback Stat Sheet
The quarterback numbers tell most of the story.
| Stat | Jordan Love (GB) | Jayden Daniels (WAS) |
|---|---|---|
| Completions/Attempts | 19/31 | 24/42 |
| Passing yards | 292 | 200 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Sacks taken | 2 | 4 |
| Passer rating | 113.9 | 85.4 |
| Rushing | 3 for 12 yards | 7 for 17 yards |
Love completed 19 of 31 passes for 292 yards and two touchdowns with no interceptions, while Daniels went 24 of 42 for 200 yards, two touchdowns and no interceptions. Neither quarterback threw an interception, so this wasn’t a turnover game. It was an efficiency and pressure game.
Three Numbers That Decided the Game
1. Yards per attempt: 9.4 vs 4.8
Love averaged 9.4 yards per pass attempt, compared with 4.8 for Daniels. That gap is huge. Green Bay hit chunk plays, with Love’s longest completion going for 57 yards, while Washington had to work for short gains and rarely stretched the field.
2. Sacks and pressure: 4 vs 2
Daniels was sacked four times and was under pressure throughout the night. Green Bay’s defense also recorded nine tackles for loss. Washington’s sacks cost Daniels 21 yards, which is why his gross passing yards (200) dropped to about 179 net.
3. The ground game: 135 yards vs 51
Green Bay ran the ball 30 times for 135 yards and a touchdown, while Washington managed 19 carries for 51 yards. The Packers could mix run and pass comfortably, which kept the defense guessing and the clock moving.
How the Scoring Unfolded
Here’s the scoring sequence in order:
- Q1: Love hit Romeo Doubs on a 5-yard touchdown pass.
- Q2: Josh Jacobs scored on a 2-yard run, and Matt Gay answered with a 51-yard field goal for Washington.
- Q3: Brandon McManus kicked a 22-yard field goal to make it 17-3.
- Q4: Daniels found Zach Ertz for a 20-yard touchdown, Love answered with an 8-yard touchdown to Tucker Kraft, McManus added a 56-yard field goal, and Daniels connected with Deebo Samuel on a 10-yard touchdown, followed by a two-point conversion pass to Luke McCaffrey.
The Kraft touchdown with just under nine minutes left was the moment the comeback stalled. Washington had pulled within seven, and Green Bay immediately answered.
Player-by-Player Breakdown
Green Bay Packers
Jordan Love, QB: The standout of the night. Along with his 292 yards and two scores, Love and Kraft connected for the touchdown that ended the Commanders’ hopes of a comeback. He stayed accurate and took few sacks.
Josh Jacobs, RB: Scored on the ground and carried a large share of Green Bay’s 30 rushing attempts, giving the offense balance.
Romeo Doubs and Tucker Kraft: Each caught a touchdown pass from Love, showing the Packers spread targets rather than leaning on receiver.
Brandon McManus, K: Kicked field goals of 22 and 56 yards. The 56-yarder pushed the lead back to nine in the final minutes.
A costly injury: Packers coach Matt LaFleur said receiver Jayden Reed would be out for quite some time after the game.
Washington Commanders
Jayden Daniels, QB: Showed toughness with two touchdown passes and no turnovers despite constant pressure. After the game, he said Green Bay simply played better than Washington.
Zach Ertz, TE: Ertz caught six passes for 64 yards and a touchdown, and was Daniels’ most productive target.
Deebo Samuel, WR: Samuel hauled in seven passes for 44 yards and a touchdown, but averaged about six yards per catch.
Terry McLaurin, WR: McLaurin was targeted nine times but caught five passes for 48 yards, and he did not score. Washington’s top receiver was kept in check.
Matt Gay, K: Made a 51-yard field goal, Washington’s points before the fourth quarter.
Injuries: John Bates and Noah Brown both left the game with groin injuries.
What the Stats Don’t Show
Raw numbers rarely tell the full story. A few things to keep in mind:
- Garbage-time points. Washington’s 15 fourth-quarter points came while Green Bay was protecting a big lead, which makes the final margin look closer than most of the game felt.
- Slow start. Washington didn’t score until late in the second quarter. Early deficits force an offense to pass more, which exposes a quarterback to more sacks.
- Pressure beats volume. Daniels threw 42 times, but the quality of those throws suffered because he rarely had clean pockets.
- Early-season context. This was a Week 2 game, when teams are still sorting out lineups and chemistry.
Quick Head-to-Head Summary
| Category | Advantage |
|---|---|
| Passing efficiency | Green Bay |
| Pass protection | Green Bay |
| Rushing yards | Green Bay |
| Turnovers | Even (none by either quarterback) |
| Late-game push | Washington |
| Final result | Green Bay, 27-18 |
What’s Next for Both Teams
The Commanders have had a rough start to the 2026 season. They’ve lost to Philadelphia (24-22), Dallas (37-20), and Indianapolis (30-13), beaten Seattle (33-31), and tied the Giants 27-27. Next up is a Monday Night Football road game against the San Francisco 49ers on October 19, where oddsmakers favor San Francisco.
For the Packers, check their official schedule and the latest standings for current results, since team form changes quickly during the season.
How to Read NFL Player Stats Like a Pro
If you want to go beyond headline numbers when you look at any box score, try these habits:
- Look at efficiency, not just totals. Yards per attempt and passer rating say more than raw yardage.
- Check sacks and pressures. They reveal how well the offensive line held up.
- Compare rushing attempts. The team with more carries often controlled the game script.
- Note when points were scored. Late scores in a lopsided game can inflate a loser’s totals.
- Cross-check sources. Different providers sometimes differ slightly on tackles, yardage, or official scoring, so use a reliable source such as the official NFL game center or Pro Football Reference.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the last Commanders vs Packers game?
The Green Bay Packers won 27-18 on Thursday, September 11, 2025.
Who had the best stats in the game?
Jordan Love led all players with 292 passing yards, two touchdowns, and a 113.9 passer rating.
How did Jayden Daniels play?
He completed 24 of 42 passes for 200 yards and two touchdowns with no interceptions, but he was sacked four times.
Are the Commanders and Packers playing again this season?
They don’t appear on Washington’s 2026 regular-season schedule. A meeting could still happen in the playoffs, so check the official NFL schedule for updates.
Where can I find full official box scores?
Use NFL.com’s game center, ESPN, or Pro Football Reference for complete play-by-play and defensive stats.
Final Take
The numbers behind this matchup came down to simple idea: pressure and efficiency win games. Green Bay protected Jordan Love, ran the ball effectively, and turned chunk plays into points, while Washington’s offense spent most of the night under siege. Anyone searching for Washington Commanders vs Green Bay Packers match player stats will find the same lesson in the box score: the quarterback with more time to throw usually has the better night.
We’ll refresh this page with new numbers the next time these teams meet.
Statistics are based on publicly reported box scores from the September 11, 2025 game and may vary slightly by provider.
